Copyright and Takedown

Status: in force. Written by the operators of this service, not by a lawyer.

This document was drafted in-house and has not been reviewed by counsel. We are telling you that rather than leaving you to assume otherwise, because you are entitled to know how much weight to put on it. What it does have going for it is that every factual claim about how the software behaves was checked against the implementation instead of adapted from a template — where the system does not do something a policy would normally promise, this says so.

If you are relying on this for a decision that matters, get your own advice.

Last updated: 2026-08-16.

For showusyourprompts.com, operated by Aleph Consulting LLC, a Nevada limited liability company. Independent instances handle their own claims.

Before filing

Prompt content here carries a licence declared in its prompt.yaml manifest (CONTENT-LICENSING.md). If a prompt is a fork of something published under a permissive or share-alike licence, its reuse may be entirely authorised. Check the declared licence first — a licensed fork is not infringement.

Filing a claim

Send to the address below, including:

1. Identification of the work you say is infringed.
2. The URL of the material on this Service you want removed.
3. Your contact details.
4. A statement that you believe in good faith the use is not authorised by the rights holder, its agent, or the law.
5. A statement that the information is accurate and that you are the rights holder or authorised to act for them.
6. Your signature (electronic is fine).

RESOLVED 2026-08-10 — DMCA §512 is the applicable regime. Aleph Consulting LLC is a US (Nevada) entity operating a service that hosts user-submitted material, so §512 safe harbour is both available and worth qualifying for.

It is not automatic. Safe harbour attaches only if the formalities are met, and two of them are concrete tasks rather than wording:

1. Designate an agent with the US Copyright Office via their DMCA Designated Agent Directory. There is a filing fee and the designation must be renewed every three years. Until it is filed the protection does not exist, whatever this page says.
2. Publish the agent's contact details on the service, reachable from the pages where infringing material appears.

We have deliberately not designated an agent, and so §512 safe harbour does not apply to this service — whatever the rest of this page might otherwise imply. That is a decision, not a task someone is about to get to, and you are entitled to know which of the two it is.

The reason is narrow and worth stating: the designation is a public, searchable record requiring a named person and a postal address. Aleph Consulting LLC's address of record is a residential one, and the directory's most motivated readers are people whose content this service has just removed. We would rather forgo a statutory protection than publish someone's home address to that audience. If a separate commercial address is established later, this decision gets revisited and this paragraph changes.

What does not change is how we behave. Everything else on this page — how to send a notice, what we do when one arrives, how to counter-notice, and how we treat repeat infringement — operates exactly as written. Those are our own commitments to you, not statutory protections for us, and they do not depend on a filing.

What we give up is the shield, not the process. If you are a rightsholder, send the notice; it will be read and acted on.

What we do

We review the claim and, where it appears well-founded, hide or remove the material and notify the person who published it, with the reason.

A note specific to this platform: removing a repository does not remove forks of it. Forks are independent copies with their own owners. A claim that covers forks needs to identify them.

Counter-notice

If your material was removed and you believe that was wrong, tell us, with:

1. Identification of the removed material and where it was.
2. A statement, under penalty of perjury where applicable, that you believe in good faith it was removed by mistake or misidentification.
3. Your contact details.
4. Your name, address and telephone number, and a statement that you consent to the jurisdiction of the Federal District Court for the judicial district in which your address is located — or, if your address is outside the United States, for any judicial district in which Aleph Consulting LLC may be found — and that you will accept service of process from the person who gave the original notice, or their agent.

Those four items track the elements 17 U.S.C. §512(g)(3) requires a counter notification to contain: your signature; identification of the material and where it appeared before removal; a statement under penalty of perjury of your good-faith belief that it was removed through mistake or misidentification; and your contact details with the consent-to-jurisdiction and acceptance-of-service statement above.

We have kept close to the statutory language on purpose. A counter-notice that paraphrases these elements can fail on its own terms, so if in doubt read §512(g)(3) directly rather than relying on our rendering of it — we are not lawyers and this page is not a substitute for the statute.

Repeat infringers

Accounts that repeatedly infringe are terminated.

We do not publish a number, because we could not currently honour one. The software has no strike-counting mechanism: nothing increments a counter when a notice is upheld, so a policy promising termination at "three strikes" would be a promise the system cannot keep. We would rather state the standard we actually apply than a threshold we cannot enforce.

What we do apply: repeat infringement is assessed by staff against the record of notices upheld against an account, in the round — how many, how recent, whether the same material keeps reappearing, and whether the account holder engaged with earlier notices at all. An account that keeps infringing after being told is terminated.

If we build strike counting, this section gets a number and the number will be enforced by the counter rather than by memory.

Misuse

Knowingly filing a false claim carries legal consequences in most jurisdictions, and we treat a pattern of bad-faith claims as abuse under the Acceptable Use Policy.

Contact

[email protected], or [email protected] — the whole domain routes to the same triage inbox.

Note this is the address for *reaching us*. The DMCA designated agent is a separate, formal filing with the US Copyright Office (see above); the address published there must match whatever is registered.